3/2/21

 This time in class we discussed evidence and how to properly explain the evidence that you've collected. We learned that evidence alone in pretty much meaningless without a thorough explanation that provides context. Something interesting that I remember him saying is bringing up the fact that the evidence needs to be "without a reasonable doubt." This makes sense because reasonable doubt can make the evidence very flawed. So you need to explain the evidence in a way that rids it of any possible doubt that is reasonable. I also appreciate the crime example he provided. It was very interesting.